Sunday, September 22, 2019

Is Trump Out?

There is no way he can survive the accusations against him going forth in the House and the Senate.

Thursday, September 19, 2019

Why Obama's Rating Didn't Matter And Trump's Will

Trump's rating has surpassed Obama's, at the point in time corresponding to Obama's bid for re-election. But, Trump is still behind Biden in every poll. Why?

The reasons are many, but all boil down to the general disappointment over how the ReBush Administration lied, outright, concerning the Iraq War.
This is one of the most vivid occasions in American History wherein a candidate, Mitt Romney, was punished along party lines by the voters, even though, ostensibly, he had absolutely nothing to do with the ReBush Administration.

The ReBush Administration is an albatross around the neck of every associated political figure. Obama sailed easily into the 2008 winner's circle due to Republican Nominee, John McCain, refusing to criticize the culture of corruption that surrounded the sinister figures of ReBush's two terms in office. In fact, he praised ReBush, and Cheney, and this seemed either disingenuous, or perilously ignorant. Either way, it was most un-presidential. 

ReBush, himself, enjoyed some historically high numbers which made him, by the numbers, anyway, one of the best presidents, ever. But, "by the numbers" can be a slippery slope to walk, and in his case, what the numbers convey is more about what the country felt about itself, instead of what it felt about him, personally.

But the issue at hand concerns the fact that Trump's Approval rate took a bump over his wisely not starting WW3. But, is it enough to drive his candidacy into the winner's circle in 2020? No. 

Here's why. 

Voters may approve of a president in sentimentalities, while still preferring another. Voters, at this point, have already made up their minds who they're going to vote for, and the polls about these categories tend to historically and accurately identify an overall winner, in spite of the incumbent president's poll numbers. 

The numbers depicting the Romney Obama race of 2012 clearly show the candidacy of Obama, in blue, dominating that of Romney, in red. And, but for two very brief moments where pollsters selected Romney, Obama's win was speaking through the polls both loudly, and clearly, to those who were examining them.

The Net Is Huge

There were some minor discrepancies between the polls. In fact, Obama accused Gallup of showing (what is felt by many Democrats) to be a Republican favoritism, and Rasmussen, also, is widely perceived to prefer the R Candidates. But Gallup hesitates to select winners, the Obama fiasco is one reason that Gallup doesn't prefer to name the winner. Rasmussen may prefer Republicans, but there are several firms who are perceived to prefer Democrats. And, that's not surprising. The Hill, and Quinnipiac University are two examples of those....

But, when all of polling firms depict one, single winner, that is really saying something about the general dissatisfaction of the American voter.

If you checked this blog you'd find my disdain for the criminal acts of Nate Silver, and certain MSM journalists at the Washington Post, and NYT, during the 2016 Election. I felt that this, above all, showed the dire need to create equal time type election regulations for the firms whose existence is protected by the open source, digital world. Nonetheless, not all polling firms fell for the 538 Scam...

An ABC/WAPO poll showed Trump would win in a close race, which he did. Gallup, which doesn't choose winners, found that Trump won the First Debate, by categorizing his performance as, "superior to Hillary Clinton's in terms of being on point, and not appearing robotic." 538 based one crazy pro Clinton 93%'ile figure on the assertion that, "Who wins the first debate, wins the election."

That is, itself, debatable.

The polls in 2016 were not unanimously arrayed against Trump, which understandably, appeared to be the case. And, the voices of political scientists ubiquitously questioned the premiere of numbers never seen, before, in the history of US Elections. These 538 numbers that infected the majority of polling firms did not go unquestioned by the political science community: we were just ignored.

Never before were percentiles awarded to candidates. Never before were candidates given numbers like, "93% Chance of Winning for Clinton!" (538, July, 2016)

That's because the TV and radio networks, and print media outlets that dared to do so, would be accountable to the Congress, and the Federal Election Commission (FEC), through laws designed to prevent this type of bogus brainwashing. The network publishing such a statement would be auditable as to how, mathematically, they arrived upon that figure....

But the Washington Post, and New York Times journalists, were working to promote these ridiculously high numbers for Mrs Clinton, and, they were promoting Mr Silver, himself. I witnessed this on Quora, and was eventually kicked off of Quora, for demanding to see their data; such had been the power they had. (Later, I was invited to return, and noticed all those journalists were now banned)...

The scam took advantage of the newness of the internet medium to election regulations, and Nate Silver simply lied, exaggerated, etc, to come up with a number (like 93% Chance of Winning!). Then, the MSM simply quoted that number, attributed it to 538, whom they spent carefully designed years praising, in stories timely planted, and lauding Silver over the no-brainer second ReBush win. By the time they were quoting his 93% type figures, he had been vetted fictionally as an election Jedi....over a single election prediction. 

But, all this shows that they had been acting in a conspiracy against Trump's candidacy. 

How we know that this is not the case, now, is the 100% poll return in favor of Biden; which is kind of rare. In normal polling data, there will be some discrepancies among the different firms. But, when they all say one one candidate, we must heed the message. 
Biden is ahead of Trump across the board. If Trump had attacked Iran, his approval would still be under 39%. 

But, this 100% consensus among the differing polling firms should be considered enough to believe that the current data shows Biden will win. 

We are not going to ever again see the Nate Silver effect: that is, intentionally bloated numbers that infect MSM headlines as though they were factual. What we are witnessing, now, is an accurate reflection that depicts what the American voter will do this November. 

Why that is unusual is that we are greater than one year away from the election, on November 3, 2020. There should be more discrepancy... Trump's political life absolutely requires that serious objection to a Joe Biden Presidency visit his favor in the Trump versus Biden Poll. 

And, obviously, there are more numbers coming. 

And because of that, we still need to check the data as it becomes available.

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

The Democratic Party Agenda Shift (1992-present)

The Democratic Party Agenda Shift

The current platform of the Democratic Party conflicts sharply with the historic goals that its members pursued as state, local, and federal government officials; whether they are elected, or appointed. This shift was never more damaging, nor as defining, as the changes ushered in by the Clinton Era. 

These changes are known as the Clinton Effect....

  • Progressive Politics have become synonymous with immorality and divisive leadership.
  •  In a total farce, and robbery of History, the Democratic platform emphasizes the minority status of blacks, as being equal to that of the LGBTP community.
  • Both parties engage in Liberal Economic Policy.
  • Both parties are corrupted by Israel and the Israeli Lobby.
  • The Democrats were once confronted by a united Republican Party, and opposed avidly in terms of war, and foreign wars, especially. Now, the Democrats are just as war like as the Republicans, but the Democrats will use covert/secret wars, where the Republicans will do both overt aggressive warfare, and covert wars.
  • The Democratic Party used to support the American worker, whom enjoyed a defensive posture in regards to the benefit of labor unions, worker's benefits and rights, and the promotion of American industrial products.
  • The modern era Clinton Effect Democrat is addle brained by myths of Human-Causes for Global Warming, the delusion that ridiculous efforts to combat this problem should be at the sacrifice of the American Worker's vitality, and this unprovable mythology is of greater importance than the morale well being of the people, as well as the failing infrastructure which is in dire need of repair.
Trump falls to 38%...Its funny, in one of the ONLY 2016 Polls that predicted Trump would win, Trump boasted via Tweet: "ABC/WAPO HAS ME AHEAD...10 POINTS!" Earlier, today, Trump railed against both of these publications as "fake news."

Donald Trump has not yet lost the 2020 Election. There are many doubts that this would be the case. But, before we celebrate any victories, let's remember that a D Party Presidency means less money, equal Israel oral satisfaction, and equal violence that benefits only Israel. 

Great Democrats, like James Madison, would have easily seen through the 9-11 Attacks, straight through to the Saudi and Israeli Intelligence Officers that perpetrated them. But, we are fresh out of great politicians from either party. 

Neither of these Tweets are accurate. Trump's lawyers could not coerce a poll return... In 2016, he loves WAPO ABC. Today...not so much....🤔

The fact is, that the US cannot advance any further into the uncertain MultiPolar World because of the large stone that serving Israel has slung around our collective necks. The fact is, that our Founding Fathers warned us about the Jews, and the tendencies that they have to create a "state within a state". But, it went largely unoticed. At his arraignment, however, Jack Ruby clearly warned us that a "fascist type government would be inserted right under our noses..."

And, it has....

The Fall of the Soviet Union, and thus, World Communism, should have also ended Hegel........ Ever really thought about why that DIDN'T happen?

The Jewish Deep State, like most things of the Hebrew Diaspora, tends to laud intellectualism in the place of fairness. This is why 92% of the Bolshevik Revolution was Jewish, and it's why Marx, and most modern Jews that operate the state within a state (aka, the Deep State), still follow Hegel. 

GWF Hegel was a political philosopher whose works inspired the Manifesto, as well as the way that the US political system views the act of voting.

Hegel wrote that a presupposed agenda, which is divided not between wrong and right, but a division of two rights (ascribing validity to both the Right and Left Wings), would require a synthetic solution to restore unity to the system. In the Jewish Deep State, and pretty much in all English Speaking governments, this Deep State is protected by the synthetic solution of "voting". It is in no way threatened by that process. 

Voting has become an illusion of public participation in the outcome of the "agenda", when, in reality, nothing actually changes through the act of voting. The same wars, the same psychopaths, and the same liars run the government from it's public posts, to its hidden and unsolicited thefts of democracy which operate daily. 

As the American public awakens to this Jewish Single Party Dialectic, it will most likely desperately swing from one party to the other, as it learns, the hard way, that this Jewish Deep State is real, and that our WW1&2-era leaders betrayed us to it; consigning the Constitution to the control of those whom despise it. 

Those leaders allowed the corruption to enter, and, in a predictable repeating of History, this group has corrupted the nation, totally. But, the synthetic nothing that voting is cannot undo the damage. As often as Hegel has been completely disproven, and shown to be based in Didactic Fallacy, certain people remain entranced by his jive, and thus the Dialectic still works in the REAL US Government...not the one they teach us about in school....

As a result, I predict a season of one term presidencies, as the American public learns that it will take more than the act of voting to end the Jewish Single Party Dialectic. Voting has been reduced to a dansé macarbre of dedicated charades. The final State's rights over voting were seized by the Homeland Security Department. This was a response to the Russiahacked nonsense, which isn't even real. Meanwhile, hardly anyone noticed.

The Non Jewish American people, the ones afraid of awakening to the damage that the pro Israeli Lobby has done to this country, will not awaken easily... 

We liked Trump, when he put us to work. We stopped liking Trump when his idiotic Trade Policies put us back onto bread lines. And, a Biden Presidency means more of the same.

Sooner or later, the quick temper of the American people should bring about the "sudden" realization that our "leaders" work for Israel. And, that this is destroying our strength as a people. Meanwhile, this deep state promotes gay marriage, and open borders; by what are an80% Jewish majority masquerading as Americans. That slow realization would tend to create an era where disillusionment with one party becomes disillusionment with both major American Political Parties.... This will happen via a process of single term presidencies, one that reveals that the absolute dedication to Israel is a parasite afflicting both parties. And, it is killing the country. 

Recently, an article which explains the real factors electing Trump was written to address the problems lingering in the D Party as a result of the Clinton Effect. This is the article.

I wrote the same factors out, three years ago....but the green issues, the war against the American worker, and the LGBTP prioritization is not included in this article. 

Living With the Clinton Era Democrat

Clinton came to office touting the poor performance of the Bush economy, as well as the stupidity of the NAFTA concept. 
He left office with full membership in Globalism, supporting NAFTA, and having lied his way to Impeachment. His support for NAFTA became the D Party's support, which united both political parties.

Along the way, though, Clinton advanced the NATO drawdown into breakneck rates, and the budgetary salient of US Dollars that never left the Defense Budget Items, (which the previous nine US Presidents had been engaged in providing for the defense of Europe), Clinton claimed was a "budget surplus"... one which was created by his awesome leadership. This, of course, is typical political hackery. However, in the falling away of the Cold War world order, neither party seemed willing to define the rise of the MultiPolar World within its party dogmas. As a result, Republicans who voted for Trump actually believed that he could restore the Cold War dominance of the US, whereas, Democrats voting for Biden will be voting to get rich with NATO dollars kept at home, while restoring the victory for immorality enjoyed by the efforts to legislate minority status to the LGBTP community. The latter of which, he will prove unable to do, just like Obama. 

These key focuses on didactic policy will fail, utterly. And, they will fail both parties, in both areas of focus. 

The next true leader of the US needs to legislate an end to the Green Agenda, and the start of the recognition that the US will lose what little dominance it still has, unless it faces the brave, new world that remains in the end of both the Cold War, and Clinton's, aka, the Democratic Party's victory over the USSR being specific to the 1990's, and not the 1950's through 1991. 

The green agenda is one which has the US well-ahead of Europe. Leaving the Paris Accords is of no consequence: the first environmental regulatory efforts are American, and were passed in 1936. The first similar European laws didn't go into effect until the early part of the 21st Century, and the lies promoted by the left, in particular, need to be exposed. What could be hiding within the folds of those social engineering efforts that they call a "primary education"?

A true leader will awaken us to the rise of the MultiPolar world, and the downgrade economically, and militarily, this rise spells for the US. Especially for either party voters who are looking to relive Cold War glories, or the Economic windfall of the NATO drawdown. Both of these are a past that has departed, and can no longer be options. They are lies when boasted of, by anyone....

Both parties will either face this reality, or grow further and further away from Americans, all the while becoming easier to see as a Jew Puppet state. 

True Graffiti, painted on the Rock, at UT Knoxville this am. Way to go Knoxville!

How Do I Talk To A Live IRS Agent?

You will have to do the following several times: It took me over 25 calls to discover this....