Introduction: Part I
The global warming issue is not an issue, it is a religion. And global warming represents an effort at relegation, by its believers, of everybody from asthmatics, to the tenth generation of miners and petroleum workers whose employment relies strictly upon Republican leadership: the entire issue is an inversion of working values and a forced dependency upon an attempt to inflate the size of the government, and replace hard earned income with a dispersal of government benefits replacing food, life, medical care for your kids, and self-respect.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the Vice President of the United States of America, Mr Al Gore
In 1992, all that most Americans knew about Al Gore was that his wife was an idiot. But, candidate Bill Clinton both promised detente with Russia, and to review and ultimately repeal NAFTA: which both issues became issues he famously lied about.
This is The Deacon's Masterpiece
As demonstrated by how Oliver Wendell Holmes once mocked the unweildy and archaic ideals embraced by our forefathers in his poem, "The Deacon's Masterpiece," American sensibilities tend to reject absurdities. In the poem, his mockery tends to be presented from the perspective of how static our insights really are, while the European world swings up and down, in a mania followed by depression, driving both joys, periods of extreme and unspeakable grief, wars, and sorrows.
In global warming the morale guidance, the resolve of disobeying the customary observances of those absurdities, is the end of the world, exactly like Victorian thinking. Violating either premise will cause the end of the world. In Victorian-era thinking: marrying a pregnant woman displeased God= punishment=the end of the world. In global warming, industry=pollution=the end of the world. Both are very rigidly reinforced by their advocates. Both have their positive qualities. But only one has ever been held to the the throat of asthmatics and the working class in this country.
Kind of remind you of anything, like, maybe, put the right object into the correct colored bin, recycle, and the world isn't going to end? But this compulsion is basic in global warming. And although it is very unhealthy, and, it is just one of a huge variety of behaviours designed to prevent the bad thing from happening, it gets worse.
As a result, we are now witnessing an entire generation of Americans engaging in this disease, while experts remain divided as to the most fundamental elements of global warming. Nobody has been able to prove that it is real. Nobody has been able to prove it is caused by man, and, frankly, the contempt for the human race, which beats at the heart of blaming mankind for this, is a level beyond hubris.
And the precepts that have yet to emerge and redeem this belief as anything else except a belief, are exactly why the Democratic party has fallen upon Divinely sent hard-times. It is simply astonishing, and despicable that Mr Gore has been permitted to imprint his personal dysfunction into an entire generation of Americans, whose adherence to the religion he has created has caused their dysfunction to emerge as an institutional dysfunction. This is tragic. This is despicable.
But it is also revealing. Snopes.com, in the last established post prior to their first-ever believability rate taking a nose-dive, tried to contest that the co-founder of the Weather Channel, John Coleman, whom stated unequivocally that global warming is a scam, did so by trying to employ the same old quacks and quackery Gore has been using. The only problem is, when they lied, they ruined their credibility. Al Gore is many things, a fact-checking service, however, is not one of them.
Mr Coleman did refute global warming. And Snopes.com attempted, very underhandedly, and, very ineffectively, to refute the tenets of his argument. The question was not did he provide indisputable proof of the fact global warming doesn't exist? Because, as you know, all religions exist in the realms outside of empirical evidence. There is not an empirical case for either argument, pro, or con. A fact Snopes will not challenge.
The question was, however, did he provide proof....proof! Which he did. He demonstrated his view, as a scientist, that the "warming" of the globe is a myth.
So, Snakes.com, the new name for snopes, altered the substance of the question, altered the focus of the question, in order to attempt to comfort small minds that do not read their entire articles, so they can barely read, and assume, with this fact-checking website's thumbs up, that, no: no climatologist has ever disagreed with the religion of global warming. But....this is actually, false.
|The Bilderberger Group cost the United States its credibility from 1963-2016. The question is, can democracy overcome the corruption attempting to frame the president, now? YES!|
The Resurrection of Walter MondaleNot only does Mr Coleman disagree with the existence of global warming as a trained climatologist, but there is a wide range of dissension emanating from within the scientific community which disputes several points along the ascension of global warming as existing, whatsoever.
And this dissension is finally gaining traction, due, in part, to the internet, and also due, in part, to the extreme loss-of-credibility experienced by the parishioners of the global warming religion, and the D party apologists, like the MSM, and Snakes.com, whom collectively, have fallen on extremely hard times in many areas, especially sales, getting elected, and credibility issues. All of which is the wider dimension of the coming cultural silence awaiting the Democratic party in the future: not laughter, not anger, not pity, but silence in regards for the faltering Democratic party.
In the storms of leadership posts shifting, and a general inability to stifle Hillary Clinton's pathetic attempts at excusing she and her husband's criminal behaviours, and questionable tactics prompting lawsuits that reveal a DNC civil war that promises to undo the entire Clinton era by reason of cover up and influence-peddling: we detect the annunciation of the return of the Walter Mondale-era of the laughability of the Democrats of the 1980's.
With the addition of criminal charges, and very real questions about how the mental illness of certain party members was not only left untreated, but was allowed to influence policies that nearly broke the back of industry in the United States, standing as perhaps the most distinct differences.
The Democrats want war with Russia, but they don't want the industry, they don't want the capable soldiers, they don't want God's blessing: that victory requires every one of those things. The lawless immoral urban landscape, a la Ed Koch's New York magnified, this is the fruit of "equality" as they see it. And whether they want it, or not, this is what they would have gotten.
The right wing in America is viewed as a force requiring that they confront it, and do battle with it, and this is the United States! The people whom need to be confronted are the criminals engaged in the conspiracies mainly being curtailed in the D party! But to call the Right in America Nazis is a perfect example of the "way too far" classlessness has been permitted to aspire.
This is the Resurrection of Walter Mondale.
Part II: Keeping Them Honest
The United States has the most environmentally conservationist government on earth. This is the nation that invented the concept of conservation, national parks, as well as animal sanctuaries: this country literally wrote the book on every single one of these subjects.
And this nation contrasts with Europe in a wide variety of ways, and remains both unique in its geographical composition, and floral and fauna composition. It only stands to reason therefore, that its laws protecting all life under and within its biosphere do not need the peer-review of a Europe that is currently too poorly-led to recognize the political nightmare which it is forcing upon its very aware older human citizens, as well as its brainwashed human youths.
Nor could Europe hope to maintain pace with the US as far as implementation of technologies. The US scientific community has traveled the gambit from the benefits of nuclear power, to the wisdom of moderation, and we remain the world's icon of environmental legislation, and will continue to be emulated.
We also have, within this nation, an identity-crisis with the realities of Europe, and global warming, itself, which would very much need to be resolved first before we could entertain any such notions of partnership in the very-soon-to-fail badly eu.
But the reality is, we remain far ahead of Europeans at every level of environmental protection, and that is due to a nearly sixty year head start, and a civilization that was pastoral until the sixteenth century.
The desperate needs for environmental protection in European nations and those same needs in the United States are nowhere close to compatible.
EurofactsIf you shipped an American vehicle to Europe until 2002, then you had to pay an expensive diesel conversion mechanic to be able to buy gas, or you had to be attached to the US military. Otherwise, unleaded fuel was simply unavailable.
Forbes spells out H Y P O C R I S Y
And that this appears to be a cyclical process.
The conclusion that humankind has caused this, however, must also then extend to humankind having created the earth, and humankind's destruction being something certain other humankind get to determine, based upon certain eligibilities, like whether it is ok for a married woman not to wear gloves on Sunday, or if putting the aluminum can into the correct recycling bin will really stave off the part of humankind worthy to destroy us: all of global warming is subjective. All of it. Every single bit.
Just like we would still have no proof he is wrong.
For, at the heart of it, global warming really does not separate the two, because it cannot, so, they are the same.
Global warming exists because climate exists. They are actually the same thing. Keep in mind, the Don Quioxte figure hunts the windmill he can slay. For Gore to say, "We must stop the climate before it stops us", while it is actually the substance of his message, the term global warming implies there is a problem that exists, that is either caused by, or can be affected by mankind, and that he is going to tell us how. So, he says global warming must be stopped, or it will stop us.
Therefore, philosophically, you have gold.
Because of many factors, nobody will be sad to see this religion regarded like other quackery, such as Scientology. But the taste of poverty that the American miners got from the Obama Administration on behalf of global warming was more than they will ever need to revisit.
Politically, global warming has been a disaster at the ballot box for the Democrats.