Sunday, September 10, 2017

Just To Clarify: Nobody Is Sure, Anymore

The Treaty of Rome is a founding treaty...but not the founding of the eu treaty. The treaty founded the European Economic Community, and involved only six nations, and ignored those nations under the Soviet sphere of influence.

  1. When did EU begin?....
  • The eu began as a 1973 effort to consolidate European economic interests. It did not, however, begin in 1973. The concept was born then.
  • The Cold War and eu never existed simultaneously. 
  • The eu is actually the computer program of debt payment and digital banking, available only at the member-state government level, called Target, and came into existence with the euro, in 2002. Target is how nations pay for regulation compliances, and the like, and how eu pays nations their annual rebates.
  • The eu refers to the lies about its biography as ascensions, and for prospective new member-states, each of them are required to adopt both the thirty-five articles of eu, as well as participate in the effort to falsify eu's past to have existed since 1957. If this were true, that eu began in 1957, then why is eu mad about Brexit? UK never signed the Treaty of Rome. The Anglosphere had too much of a role in the Cold War, and carries with it a general regard of eu being ridiculous.

The three pillars of eu are, in reality, the celebrating of the adoptions making the idea theoretically possible. Not until Target is a functional regime noted.

The question of the evolution of one of several international agreements into eu is one of inconsistency, confusion, subjectivity, and downright dishonesty. 

The truth is that there is more than one correct answer. But the terminologies of Brexit, for example, hard or soft Brexit, are not terminologies relevant this picture, as it draws near to completion. 

But there are many ways to answer the question. But then, there are the succinct, and forthright answers which tell more of the story as far as regime, and economy, among other topics for which a nation or state engages another, or handles trade, or hears the grievances of its own citizens.

Since nation means "common and unified", one regime to view is economy. For eu, this is specifically the drama of the Eurozone and Euro.

If we are to use this measure, the EU began to function as a meta-state which regulated trade and governed its people in 2002, when the agreements as per the Maastricht Treaty allowed the original first 8, then 11 EU nations, to accept and issue the Euro, or, to opt out and retain both its currencies, as well as trading and using the Euro.

But, here is one of the many obstructed paths to a straight story. Did the EU exist since the 1957 Treaty of Rome? 

Did the Euro exist prior to 2002?
Is the Euro the EU?
Is Europe, the continent, EU? 
Is the unified meta-state EU?
Does each nation of the original eu-8, then eu-11, have a unique story to tell, and, if so, therein, will a straight answer be found?

When Did eu Begin?
The post World War 2 Europe was still reeling from the damage, guilt, and efforts to recover from the disasters strewn from extreme to uttermost, and to forget that Germany, for instance, was divided among the victorious allies would seem typical of the rose-colored reviews which identify eu's formation to arrive twelve years following the conclusion of the European hemisphere of that struggle. 

The eu's official bio places the date of the 1957 Treaty of Rome, in which six nations signed an acknowledgement of the need to view Europe as a community, and Europeans as neighbors, as its effective date of existence.

But, this is still only a treaty, and not a union. The EU 8 begin rumbling about a European Economic Community, which kind of comes about in the 70's. But, like Brexit, this, too suffers from major ideological differences resulting in the major players not objecting to backing-off of the idea of actual unity.

"The Euro is EU."-John Paul Juncker

The fact is, the entire effort to collectivize a geographic region already connected by the fact that they share a continent, is going to be a subjective one, meaning, specifically, differing academic disciplines may have very compelling albeit entirely different reasons to make arguments about actual relevant dates of eu's birth.

But, we all agree that the Treaty of Maastricht does not, in of itself, create eu as it is now. Signed in 1993, the Treaty of Maastricht is named for the city in the Netherlands where Globalists of first the Original EU-8, the 8 nations whose idea this is, then the EU-11, began forming an economic community unified under several re-conceptions of power, national sovereignty, and economic vitality. It should be mentioned at this point, that UK 
belongs neither to the EU-8 nor the EU-11. But, by 1998, UK is definitely not interested in joining EU due to the Euro. Both public polls, then prominent British politicians eventually convince the still-unformed meta-state that if it desires UK participation, then it must reconsider the existence of the Eurozone, the zone in which the ancient nations of Europe surrendered their economic existences via also surrendering their currency.

This would seem to prove that the euro, as well as the establishment of first Target, then Target 2 are going to be the actual dates of creation for eu. Had UK not joined, this would be a different requirement. But, the euro, as well as the Target system, go into effect in the year 2002.

Both of the Target systems represent a consolidation of banks and resources which establish eu as what we know it to be, today. It is a digital nation unifying debt issues, and is the vital organs of the meta state. 

Target 1 was originally just called Target, as the problems resulting in the Target 2 program's creation, in 2007, were unknown to the EU as it both issued the euro, and began to consolidate the businesses cooperatively which now would be fed fresh supplies of cash by their mutual participation in Target.

Famously, Italian EU Central Bank chief, Mario Draghi, when weighing the great likelihood that the nation of his birth would exit eu, said, "If Italy continues to participate in Target-2, then any means which it rebuilds BTI (its bond market....which is the very sensitive pulp of the value of the Lira, which it will need to reissue) would be successful."

Of course, this is true. And to translate this into political scientist, it reads: if Italy were to reissue its economic existence, and simultaneously acknowledge the abstract participation is eu participation, then Italy's exit would be something eu could really not object to...although it would possibly begin to bring doubts in eu to a boil, helping to fuel a rush centered-around the cry, "Last nation to be Target-2 only participants will lose EVERYTHING."

Which, of course, is true.

This no doubt brought scorn from JPJ, famous for once declaring, "EU is the euro..."
Often falsely attributed to eu, the Chunnel's 1994 completion beats eu's fiscal birthdate by eight years. 


  1. The question of eu existence is often confused with NATO's, the European Economic Community, and the post WW2 Council of Europe, a forty-seven nation group created by the allies to consolidate efforts to rebuild the infrastructure and economies of Europe.
  2. The truth about eu's existence is that without UK, the original 11 nations would have had to limit the consolidations which created eu at or around the levels presumed by the Treaty of Maastricht, 1993.
  3. Ensuing treaties to consolidate the issues remaining, such as law enforcement, or free-movement, could not have extended beyond the nations of Central and Western Europe without UK's acceptance.
  4. The Chunnel is often misrepresented as a eu effort.
  5. IRA/Ulster Unionist Peace Accords are often falsely credited to EU.
  6. Target, then Target-2 is the EU, and Target came into being with the Euro, in 2002, Target-2, in 2007. Target's participating-nation rolls decreasing is bound to shake the meta-state until it must rewrite its bio to state that the European continent is eu, and was formed during the splitting of Eurasia from Pangea.
  7. eu is destroying itself by Angele Merkel's insane and unbelievably irresponsible immigration policies being quietly resisted in eu-11 member-states, and openly defied by Visegrad 4. 
  8. The recent charges against three of the four Visegrad Group members will most-likely result in a hard-break of the four nations of the Visegrad Group, Slovenia, Hungary, The Czech Republic, and Poland. The efforts to preserve eu eastward expansions shall then fail, allying the former Austro-Hungarian Empire's member states against eu.
  9. Italy, Spain, Portugal, and Greece have sustained irreparable harm due to the Merkel presence in their right to self-determination in regards to the refugee issue.
  10. The democracies of Europe are under siege by the process of macroning. Named for the French president whose election proved that the citizens of a nation were being outvoted by a parasitic immigrant population, macroning is importing a population and awarding them cash and citizenship in spite of their inability to speak the host language, or any knowledge of the history of the nation into which they have been imported. This is all given in exchange for the individual's vote being cast in-favor of preserving eu-friendly candidates in power, as the meta-state engages in betrayals of natural born Europeans and social Darwinism. The immigration issue teeters on the cusp of re-igniting the slave trade. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Consequences

  What Happens When You Steal An Election? From straight out of the CIA regime-change handbook: capture the electoral process and the commun...