|August 18, 2015: Clinton meets with black lives matter shortly after announcing her candidacy on April 12, 2015.|
This was the beginning of traditional campaign season in January 2016, a season in which the leading candidates would distinguish themselves in terms of what they thought about black lives matter. And each candidate was more than willing to do so.
The Roles of Polls
Polling firms then revealed themselves to be either out of touch, or blatantly fraudulent. The very few that put Trump as the winner were either ignored, or repudiated by the 538 organization, whose founder, Nate Silver, made the unsubstantiatable and unqualified claim that he had chosen each winner since 1988. I, personally, have never heard of Nate Silver, but I have picked each winner since 1976, and been wrong, too. It seemed, from outward appearances, that the results of 538 were simply reproduced by the other firms except Gallup, which never had Trump less than the winner consistently. But Gallup was the exception.
Thus when the media outlets nationwide feigned shock on Nov 20, 2016, it wasn't actually a surprise that Trump won. It was the moment that collectively, the various outlets suddenly faced that they have lost a damaging amount of credibility, and tried to recoup it in recent months by pushing the Russia hacked conspiracy. The seeds of that disparity, between what they attempted to force at the polls, and the results of the election, were the 538 polls, although it is of a great likelihood that each media outlet actually knew what the election results would be. But the damage was done. There would be a lasting loss of credibility, and the realities of the fear and the race-bating, as well as the cheating, were now deconstructed world-wide. Only this time, the various organizations would not be able to escape their ties to Rothschilds and Bilderberger control.
But the catalyst of all this was the riots, and the war against the law enforcement officers in every state in which these murders occured, and it inflicted scars upon the black lives matter movement in general. The killings were vile acts. But the black lives matters movement helped to create the myth that these murders were somehow divine justice. This infuriated the US voters beyond party affiliations because the out-of-touch and unrealistic goals of black lives matter offended everybody.
The election of 2016, therefore, was more of an indictment of black lives matter by the victorious Trump voters, than it was the embracing of such a controversial figure. Trump voters felt, that in some small way, this would express the outrage and contempt for the violence and behaviour of black lives matter which both the Clinton and Sanders camps had shockingly endorsed. The Clinton campaign went into the last hours of the election still loudly repeating those endorsements. And this caused Trump voters to feel that voting for Trump was the last exit from the highway of open race war in the streets, and in the rural, as well as urban, American landscape.
Like the Charlotte riots, which fizzled out early due to the revelations by the Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Dept that the officer whom shot Keith Scott was also black, and the shooting was justified: black lives matters has sort of fizzled-out. And the entire nation breathed a sigh of relief upon the echoes of murders and destructive events that never were, because Clinton lost.
In time I am certain that people will forget the role black lives matters played in defeating Clinton, then you may see them re-emerge and act foolishly again. Hopefully, nobody will have to die, regardless of their ethnicity.